Lawyers sanctioned for ‘conspiracy idea’ election fraud lawsuit

Lawyers sanctioned for 'conspiracy theory' election fraud lawsuit



The attorneys — Gary D. Fielder and Ernest John Walker — that filed the election lawsuit in late December 2020 in Colorado federal court docket now should pay attorneys charges for Facebook, Dominion Voting Systems, the states of Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia and Wisconsin, and the non-profit Center for Tech and Civic Life, all of which had been named as defendants within the lawsuit, Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter dominated.

Neureiter wrote a scathing 68-page opinion condemning the post-election lawsuit, calling it an “enormous conspiracy theory” and doubtlessly defamatory. The lawsuit had no legal professionals or consultants that had been in a position to help the claims, the decide famous.

The ruling on Wednesday marks the primary main consequence in federal court docket to befall legal professionals and litigants who pushed President Donald Trump’s try and undermine the 2020 election end in court docket.

It may additionally play into a number of different proceedings the place judges are contemplating reprimands for Trump’s authorized groups and people of his supporters.

The states, Dominion, Facebook and the nonprofit are set to estimate their authorized bills by later this month so the decide can decide sanction cost quantities.

Fielder and Walker didn’t instantly remark for this story.

A declare within the lawsuit that Dominion had deleted votes for Trump was extremely disputed, inflammatory and unverified, the decide additionally famous. Several different legal professionals for President Donald Trump and his marketing campaign repeated that declare in different court docket circumstances and are dealing with potential sanctions and punishment earlier than different courts, and Dominion has sued for defamation.

“The unique circumstances of this case, including the volatile conditions surrounding the 2020 election, the extremely serious and potentially damaging allegations against public servants and private entities, the remarkable request to declare void and ineffective the certification of the electoral votes of several states, along with an extraordinary money demand of $160 billion and the lack of any time pressure, meant that any reasonable pre-filing investigation needed to involve extensive due diligence and the testing of the allegations, including actually talking to human beings, such as the lawyers who filed the failed lawsuits and the experts who submitted affidavits. Under the circumstances of this case, Plaintiffs’ counsel did not fulfill this obligation,” the decide wrote.

“The public statements from authoritative sources and courts rejecting allegations of widespread voter fraud or ballot-rigging should have been, if not bright red, at least flashing yellow lights warning Plaintiffs’ counsel to proceed with caution,” Neureiter added. “Instead, they drove through the lights at full speed, even accelerating.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

%d bloggers like this: